[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > May I ask for the reason of this change. I think it's very > convenient to have this kind of shortcut, especially for > scripts, where two different layout objects are involved, > depending on the type of script.
I deemed it unnecessary since there is already very convenient shorthand (_ and ^) for tuning individual objects. If many objects need to be tuned, the appropriate \override takes little more work than \scriptUp/Down The decision isn't final, but I would like to phase out the shortcuts in ly/property-init.ly gradually, replacing them with more generic mechanisms. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
