On Tuesday 17 August 2004 00.46, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > With 2.3.11, I understand that the notation \notes \relative c {..} is
> > ambiguous. But I'm surprised that it even is forbidden.. is this
> > intentional?
>
> Yes. \notes is no longer necessary, and references to it will be
> removed from the manual.
That's cool.. however I don't understand why "\notes {c}" is allowed while
"\notes \relative c {c}" is a syntax error. The \notes keyword can apparently
be left out in both cases.
Erik
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
