Anthony Fok writes: > Oh, sorry, I should have been more clear. What I meant is "please > remove these files from the upstream source tree after applying the > lilypond_2.2.2-2.diff.gz patch." :-) > > http://foka.dnsalias.net/~foka/lilypond/lilypond_2.2.2-2.diff.gz
Thanks, applied. > Thank you! :-) It's my duty. > > Actually, I have an ulterior motive for finally updating lilypond too > because I will hopefully be finding some time to actually use it again > soon. I joined a local Catholic parish here in Beijing in recent months > and joined the parish youth choir (about 16-20 people?), and seeing the > overall lack of resource in liturgical and sacred music scores, I > thought LilyPond could really help here. :-) Good to hear that. > As you may know, most music scores here in China use the "numerical > notation" (or simple notation), e.g.: > lilypond-user, and is thinking how to go about that... whether numerical > notation could be typeset today with LilyPond, or with scheme extension, > or need to write C++ code. Hmm... Any help or pointers would be great. I probalby can't really help, I don't know much about it. Does a formal language/definition exist? If so, writing an input filter might be not be too difficult? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
