As you yourself wrote in your previous email, beams are sometimes used instead of slurs to indicate melismas. In that case, it's likely that the automatic beams often don't give the desired melismas. That's probably why it was decided to only use manual beams for melismas in LilyPond.
Regarding the question in your previous email, LilyPond by default interpretes both manual beams and slurs as melismas. Doesn't that cover your needs?
/Mats
Marco Gusy wrote:
I noticed that lyricsto listens to manual beams in lyrics-melisma-beam.ly regression test. Why only manual ones?
By the way, there isn't the melisma in that example...
_______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
-- ============================================= Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe =============================================
_______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
