[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > > We already changed system includes to -init.ly, after which we > > realized that this breaks compatibility slightly, and is more of > > nuisance to type. > > Yeah. Has this anything to do with using .ily instead of .ly ?
Yes, it is the same type of change. However, I understand your point - but I don't particularly like ily as an extension. How about .ly.inc or .lyinc ? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
