[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > [stuff snipped] (are we going to see a patch?)
> An easy way to implement invisible accidentals would be to add a > "invisible"-style to the cautionary accidentals - so that one could turn > accidentals invisible by setting cautionary-style to "invisible" and > marking the to be invisible accidentals as cautionaries. The drawback on > this, ofcourse, would be that one could not have cautionary accidentals > and invisible accidentals at the same time. Invisible accidentals? What are those for? > Editorial accidentals... Hmm.. I have no experience with such things. Is > it neccesary to have both normal accidentals and editorial accidentals > on the same note - i.e. as in > > > # > > | > | > b O| > > ? > In this case the best would probably be to make the editorial > accidentals completely independent of the note, so that one would do > something like ges^gis to achieve the above. probably something like ges-\editorialSharp. One could use a scheme function or a special Performer to select which accidentals to use. > one would not be able to parenthesize editorial accidentals either. why? > Alternatively - if we don't wish to support different accidentals on > editorial and main accidentals - we could reserve a third symbol > (yikes) yikes indeed. Let's not do that. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
