On Sat, 07 Jun 2003 20:36:37 -0700 Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: > >On Sat, 07 Jun 2003 20:11:01 -0700 > >Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>getopt-long.cc: In function `char* dcgettext(...)': > >>getopt-long.cc:24: `s' undeclared (first use this function) > > > >Are you sure you're building with gcc 3.2? This is the error that we > >saw with gcc 3.3; Jan supplied a patch for it. > > > If symlinking /usr/bin/gcc and /usr/bin/g++ to the 3.2 versions is > enough then yes.
If you're fast enough, you can see what version of gcc and g++ it's using from watching the output of ./autogen.sh and ./configure. > >It should work now. > > > It has gone past that point and it did output 'warning huh?' when it > went by. Does this mean it will compile with gcc 3.3 now. Will that > patch or something better be in CVS at some point? I can compile it with gcc 3.3.. As for the patch, I believe that the patch works around a bug in flex or some other development package. Jan send the bug to them, so it should be fixed in a future version of flex. After a while, the updated version of flex will get packaged in debian/unstable, and shortly after that (there aren't too many bugs listed for flex), it'll hit debian/testing. I don't expect the patch to enter CVS, but once you've patched your own version(manually or automatically), CVS won't overwrite that file. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
