On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 05:23:41PM +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> I would really like if you would stick to no-direction >> finger-markings in the example (i.e. c'-2 instead of c'^2). This way >> we allow for c_3 and c^3 to mean other things in the future - I still >> like the idea of entering notes by fret instead of by string. >> If the player is using a strange tuning, where two strings are tuned to the same note, then simply defining note-fret is not specific enough. note-string would work though. I don't foresee any case where note-fret can handle something that note-string can't.
>Another thing. Does it happen that guitar players need two out of >fingering/fret/string number? In that case, we should come up with some >convention (eg. > > c4-2-3 > >= 2nd finger, 3rd string) > Fingering is needed a lot in classical guitar, but there is usually not a tab, except for very introductory level music. I don't believe I've ever seen fingering in a guitar tab. On the other hand, you shouldn't disallow a user from being able to do something, simply because it's not common practice. As a side note, I'm not familiar with banjo, nor other instruments where tablature is commonly used. Tim Nowaczyk -- <>< Truth ----------Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG fingerprint = 1612 3E41 D649 63ED 222D EB27 E84D 4274 392C A50A _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
