<oops - resending to the list..> On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 12:01:31AM +0100, Rune Zedeler wrote:
> Some comments, though: > - when doing a up-down-tick, the two diagonal lines line up to each > other instead of overlapping. The result is > > X X > XXXXXX > XXX XXX > XXX XXX > XXXXX XXXXX > XXXX XXXX That's odd. I seem to remember finding this problem once and fixing it. Do they look like that on all inputs? They overlap on all the inputs I've tested it on. > - how do you do a Ped____|Ped__| without destroying the spacing? I > would prefer to define a sustainUpDown for the wedgde and let \sutainUp > \sustainDown do the above instead. Hmm. That would need to be added as a new style option, I suppose. > - and generally how do you state that pedal mark should last to the end > of note (not to start of next note)? I decided to make them end at the start of notes, to be consistent with the existing code for Ped. *. I also had trouble coding the length of the line so that it lasted to the end of the note and no further. Now I think of it, they do mean musically different things - i.e. for b c d _____| you would have a smooth phrase, but without the c and d blending. but for b c d _______| the sound of the b and c would blend with the d . That'll have to be a todo for the 'shorten' code in setup_sustain_pedal(). -- chris _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
