On 08/03/17 20:53, Jim Wright wrote: > + 1, this is exactly what some of us had argued and hoped for, thanks > and kudos to the code.mil team for hearing it and fingers crossed that > this approach is adopted broadly.
Those who support this new direction may want to +1 here: https://github.com/deptofdefense/code.mil/issues/112 Gerv _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
