From: Christopher Sean Morrison <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, Mar 07, 2017, 5:57 PM
To: [email protected] 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD



On Mar 07, 2017, at 04:09 PM, Richard Fontana <[email protected]> wrote:

By my reading, those "distribution terms" violate OSD #1 and #7.  This is 
potentially a problem for any license (e.g., all the permissives) that doesn't 
specifically speak to patent rights.  If the distribution terms specifically 
deny a patent grant, it will no longer be possible to freely redistribute the 
source code (that is, IF any contributor holds patent rights whose claims are 
implemented by the source code...).
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss

Reply via email to