"Lawrence Rosen" <[email protected]> writes: > Open Source friends, > > I discovered in the past few days on other lists that there are > several misleading descriptions of my AFL/OSL/NOSL 3.0 licenses on FSF > and OSI websites. Neither site bothered to publish my own description > of these licenses, and their own characterizations are incorrect. > > Please see this: http://rosenlaw.com/OSL3.0-explained.htm. > > I would appreciate it if FSF and OSI would copy this document to their own > websites instead of inventing their own.
I happen to be on this list and to have seen this, but in the interest of efficiency for any follow-up discussion that might need to happen about the FSF list, would appreciate if you'd send the concrete suggestion (what to remove and what to add) to [email protected]. -john -- John Sullivan | Executive Director, Free Software Foundation GPG Key: 61A0963B | http://status.fsf.org/johns | http://fsf.org/blogs/RSS Do you use free software? Donate to join the FSF and support freedom at <http://my.fsf.org/join>. _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
