On 11/12/2015 10:33 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
Sun never bothered to request approval for 1.1 as the lawyers involved
regarded the changes as trivial.
Hmmm. Doesn't that put consumers in the awkward position of using
software which is not strictly speaking under an OSI-approved license?
I notice that the license at Glassfish has also been updated to have
Oracle as the license steward. Would anyone object if I ask them to
submit the revision to license-review for approval?
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Mike Milinkovich
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
I note that Glassfish uses CDDL 1.1
<https://glassfish.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL_1_1.html>, but that
all references on the OSI website are to CDDL 1.0
<http://opensource.org/licenses/CDDL-1.0>.
Does anyone know the reason why there is this version mismatch?
Did something fall through the cracks here, or is there some
longer story?
--
Mike Milinkovich
[email protected]
+1.613.220.3223 (mobile)
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
