On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Rick Moen <[email protected]> wrote:
> but OSI would be > remiss in just outsourcing OSI Certified assessments to FSF or anyone > else. > I agree with this objection. Perhaps changing the license list from the licenses on the FSF page to the list of OSI-approved licenses would be a suitable way to address it. This, of course, limits the list and would appear to exclude the public domain and similar. I'm not sure if that really matters, since I don't understand what the real point of this license is. -- Ben Cotton _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
