Zluty Sysel scripsit: > Well, since the code is distributed under a license that requires > disclosure there was some fear internally that disclosure and license > reproduction would be mandatory for all users of the source code.
It is a mistake to suppose that the BSD and similar licenses require disclosure of the source code. Rather, they presuppose it. If you are in possession of the source code, you get certain rights; if you aren't in possession, you get no rights. There is code in Windows that was licensed under the BSD license�, but that fact does not mean that anyone outside Microsoft has the right to receive that source code from Microsoft. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] Don't be so humble. You're not that great. --Golda Meir _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
