-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 27/05/2015 18:17, Lawrence Rosen wrote:
> If we amended the proposal to leave out the GPL licenses, would that c alm your concerns? Right now, if I want to use a software package distributed by The Apache Software Foundation, I can safely assume ^1 that it is the standard Apache License, and all I have to be concerned about ^2, is how well the standard Apache license fits with the license(s) for a project, or proposed project that I'm working on. The second issue is: "What will prevent an Apache project from unilaterally changing to a different license?" ^1: I know that some projects currently use code that is licensed under something else, but those are both rare exceptions, (at least I hope that is the case) and utilize a license that either or both FSF and OSI consider to be compatible with the standard Apache license. ^2: This is that planning/proposal/mockup stage. During coding, source code licenses are verified to be what was expected, and what was adverti sed. jonathon * English - detected * English * English <javascript:void(0);> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVZpXoAAoJEE1PKy9+kxplnFUP/ijO7cqHF1ICJszrdgQru2Nn C+S3JHdGnekTSC7POwAz7mqniFtelSz/dUNYyYUUp1yEiF0WIQS5vSxcXBBbOYOi oFQUGW/wzKQOSqSNYHy5FBkuyyacSZPeEBrLAOSpE9dAV+r98F9wv3W4oJSecCzg nh+JHDCFKMuAUw3nrqPUqs/CqZRBWI812wC93P7NgP4JEg2V5i/K0MKo/D/lBp6v ip7bL/AR0RyXIpMPUsgnoOihm+RDioec19bwcGhhJVcn3DG8GzM8eFU7wCFZQQ16 472zxgU01BrZwItFhZSFGrt9JE9n9R6Y4sLmcdtpQMa6v8aMid0vnjMnmKzUJqQR a+PtESTLn3xf6Xe8BNoMqwGd/M38WBH9l0/HGk1CCncsYsipBxPyyk7fNEho7dt8 t+kdXDNdHe4yxRNqmDfMALYg4nDmzbnSZl5Fbr4S/kMnymyhQlbAJWoZtDd/LX8G Zmb+3BeWHNvGdJGFM4EFbxbbM1VkUQTE+8wvssEZzafse9vvqBmGJ6h2nSf7thPK qD7y5T1uLgD525RJ3Yt1+wOU9FLGS1T8Oy/m9OmFt4abohFY1ulZ4MBYGckYf5fY RWaGwQhOLWzGdGdJiPSZoJM+JPO8+F8CIVkfvoLri97UgRLMUhLzXyBA5yZOQxuY S6s5wMFPQBRGY1QAE6Iw =3ual -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
