On 05/26/2015 02:44 PM, Grahame Grieve wrote: > "ALL OSI-approved licenses are open source. Other licenses are not" > > I don't think that the last bit is right. > > "other licenses cannot be known to be" or "other licenses may not be" - > but you can't outright claim that just because OSI has not approved a > license, it's *not* open source
Yes, good clarification. That's certainly not what we meant to imply. Mainly we were focused on the fact that the set of open source licenses includes more than just the GPL. Allison _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
