Jim Jagielski scripsit: > So, at least according to > https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html, > the FSF considers LGPL as weak copyleft.
Looking at the uses of 'weak' on that page suggests that to the FSF, at least, a weak copyleft license is one that permits the licensed work to be incorporated in a larger proprietary work, whereas a strong copyleft license does not (at least in the FSF's opinion). This seems an appropriate distinction for general use. Neither of these should be confused with Grave and Perilous Licenses. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] No, John. I want formats that are actually useful, rather than over- featured megaliths that address all questions by piling on ridiculous internal links in forms which are hideously over-complex. --Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
