Quoting David Woolley ([email protected]): > On 01/04/15 18:32, Tzeng, Nigel H. wrote: > > >So I depend that the CC organization has put forth a best effort in making > >sure the human-readable summaries match the legal text. > > A significant number of postings on this list are from people who > are trying to interpret GPL in a way that would be inconsistent with > any CC-like summary of it. Those people would still try to find > loopholes based on the full licence, not the lay summary.
IMO, their pain is a happy accident. So, basically, what's your point? I believe Nigel's audience of concern was reasonable people seeking to understand a legal instrument, not rules-lawyering proprietary software businesspeople. _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
