On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Luis Villa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Karl Fogel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Luis Villa <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Might be a good idea to finally start the list of non-open licenses >> someone >> > suggested a few months ago ;) >> >> Oh, that is *such* a good idea. >> >> This is the "list of licenses that people often mistake for being open >> source, or whose authors claim are open source, but are actually not >> or at least have not been evaluated by the OSI", right? >> > > Slightly more broad than that: a list of licenses that we have rejected, > including the rationales for rejection. Your list would presumably be a > subset, as some licenses might have been submitted and rejected without a > later, false claim to being open source. >
Essentially equivalent to what FSF does in their license list, really. Luis
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
