Hi, On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Rick Moen <[email protected]> wrote:
> CCO contains a well-drafted fallback to permissive terms in the > event that its primary intent runs afoul of local law (as is a serious > problem with such efforts), while Unlicense is a badly drafted crayon > licence, apparently thrown together by software engineers imagining they > can handwave away the worldwide copyright regime by grabbing a bit of > wording from here, a bit from there, throwing the result out in public, > and hoping for the best. > > My initial comments on Unlicense: > > http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2012-January/000026.html > > I never bothered getting to patent complications. > > CC0 explicitly states that it doesn't grant patent rights if there are any. Is this not going against the purpose of putting the work in public domain itself ? Regards.
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
