Speaking for myself I find the CC mechanism and license chooser quite nice and not problematic at all for the vast majority of use cases.
On 8/17/13 9:38 PM, "Richard Fontana" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Speaking just for myself, it is difficult for me to imagine any >license chooser or license explanation site that I wouldn't think was >more problematic than useful. Linking to a *wide* variety of license >choosers or summary sites with a very strong caveat emptor statement >might be okay. > > - RF _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
