On 8/17/2013 9:38 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
Speaking just for myself, it is difficult for me to imagine any
license chooser or license explanation site that I wouldn't think was
more problematic than useful. Linking to a*wide* variety of license
choosers or summary sites with a very strong caveat emptor statement
might be okay.
Because you are so intimately familiar with the licenses and know every
feature and blemish, so you seek the perfect when maybe we should only
aspire to the better-than-nothing. Maybe not; I read your slides and
take your point that "nothing" isn't really all that scary. But I'm
having a little difficulty reconciling the concepts that a narrower
choice of tested licenses is better (i.e., license proliferation is bad)
but we're not going to help you understand how these licenses work so
you can make a better-informed, albeit perhaps not perfect, choice.
Pam
Pamela S. Chestek, Esq.
Chestek Legal
PO Box 2492
Raleigh, NC 27602
919-800-8033
[email protected]
www.chesteklegal.com
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
