Quoting Ben Tilly ([email protected]): > (Note that Robert Jacobsen's state of mind was never a relevant > question.
Excuse me, but please see previous analysis of what a judge will logically and relevantly consider in determining what a software licensor intends, and why, in cases where that is for some reason unclear. > If you look back to my first email in this thread where I started off > with the phrase, "...where someone who in some way represents the > drafter..." Alison is not the drafter of AL 1.0 (or anything else, really), and I don't know what your phrase 'represent the drafter' means or what in Ghod's green earth it has to do with the antecedent discussion. I don't think I care. And you seem to be ignoring my larger point. > What have I have said that could possibly support the impression that > I thought that the judge considered her a witness to Robert Jacobsen's > state of mind??? OK, so you're carrying out some entirely different conversation from the one I was engaged in upthread, basically. Have fun. I'm out. _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
