On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:11 AM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > More than ever this license needs a justification in detail of its sparse > differences from Apache.
To be clear, the license must be submitted following the rules at http://opensource.org/approval - including: 1. Submit before final, whenever possible, to allow for revisions based on feedback **2. Clearly state rationale for a new license** **3. Compare to and contrast with the most similar OSI-approved license(s)** 4. Provide results of any legal analysis available **5. Recommend which license proliferation category is appropriate** Luis _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
