On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Karl Fogel <[email protected]> wrote: > Luis Villa <[email protected]> writes: >>What's the state of robots.txt and the wiki? If this page will be >>showing up in search results, I'd like it to slightly clearly identify >>itself as a brainstorm that is not endorsed/approved. > > I modified the page to be clear about that. > > (We don't have a robots.txt for the wiki, but I don't think we need one > either -- pages should be searchable, and they should say their status > accurately).
I'm fine with that, as long as we're all clear on it, and the responsibility it places on all of us. :) >>I'd also like to reemphasize that I think this is a can of worms that >>I personally don't think we have the focus/organization to tackle >>effectively yet. I haven't seen anything in this thread that changes >>my mind on that yet. > > Actually, I agree. But no reason not to have the materials in the wiki > -- that way you and I can be wrong without having damaged anything :-). :) Luis _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
