Luis Villa <[email protected]> writes: >2) The archived OSI discussion about acceptance of the license, >starting with the official license submission. For example, for MPL, >this would be: >http://projects.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review/2011-December/000005.html > >Before folks dive in, though: > >1) Does anyone object to this? >2) Are there any additional pieces of information we could provide?
Only that finding the archived OSI discussion may be non-trivial the further back in time you go -- our archives moved to projects.opensource.org only recently. I'm not sure how many different homes they had before that, and I'm not sure which moves involved copying over existing archives and which didn't. Cheery, eh? :-) -K _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
