Hi, license-discuss: Based on the discussions we've had here over the second half of 2012, I've published a revised version of opensource.org/licenses this morning.
A few minor tweaks were made to the last draft based on comments here; the biggest being a reference to the FAQ and inclusion of several questions from the FAQ. I've also included a reference to the proliferation report so that it is more clear how the list of "popular", etc. was arrived at, and strengthened the language around the links to the complete lists so that it is more clear that those licenses are also approved and usable. The page is still a work in progress, in two ways: 1) Cosmetically: suggestions on grammar, layout, or uncontroversial content (e.g., adding links to other FAQ questions; otherwise beefing up the content) are still very welcome, either in this thread or by personal email. 2) Substantively: as has been pointed out and discussed at length, the current categories could stand revision, probably including more objective criteria. PLEASE do not use this thread to discuss that issue. If you have specific, concrete, suggestions, please start new threads, or respond to my older thread on objective criteria. Luis _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
