GPL isn't a work of art? !
Grahame On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Rick Moen <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Grahame Grieve ([email protected]): > >> well, ok, but on what grounds would copyright not apply? > > I believe Larry was asserting his view that a software licence consists > solely of functional elements, and no expressive (artistic) elements (or > not enough that a judge would recognise copyright eligibility). > > That's a fundamental concept in USA copyright law; I have no idea how > many other jurisdictions have it. > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss -- ----- http://www.healthintersections.com.au / [email protected] / +61 411 867 065 _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
