On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Johnny Solbu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday 16 July 2012 15:43, Casey Rodarmor wrote: >> > (As an example, we are legaly required to give credit to King James as the >> > author when we redistribute the old 1611 KJV Bible.) >> >> This kind of blew my mind. What are the benefits--supposed or >> otherwise--of such a law? > > The reasoning behind it is to give credit to the authors. To ensure that > happens, the law make it as a statutory requirement. The author cannot waive > this right.
the author cannot waive his right? Does that mean publishing as anonymous is barred by statute? Best Wishes, Chris Travers _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
