Quoting Chris Travers ([email protected]): > Can you name a single case where a US court has said that if literal > copying of code is required for interoperability of practical software > or other practical tools (printer cartridges, garage door openers, > etc), that this gives the copyright owner control over the markets for > add-on products?
Can you name a single reason why this utterly bizarre question has any connection whatsover to anything I've said? It doesn't. _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
