[Changing the subject line because, as I noted when I posted the original proposal, the proposal was *not* about changing the recommended list at this time. Please use the original subject line for comments germane to my original proposal.]
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Lawrence Rosen <[email protected]> wrote: > Luis Villa asked: > > Putting aside the specific basis for your objections for now, why are you > objecting now and not in the past five years this list has been in use? Is > there a particular change in the context that you think the new draft > language introduces, or...? > > Luis, I have objected regularly and consistently to that particular list. > Look in the archives. I'm tired of OSI suggesting that it will take "another > five years" to simply get rid of it. Replace it with something with meaning > and purpose. I've offered drafts of that improved categorization. Again, > look in the archives. I've been on the list for almost exactly five years (at least under this email address) and my archives don't appear to have any such drafts or discussions from you. I'd be happy for pointers to them, though. Luis _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
