Karl Fogel scripsit: > So I've drafted this page: > > http://opensource.org/licenses-draft
I think this is an excellent idea and a good first cut. I think the list of top licenses is the correct list. However, I would reorder it to GPL, Apache, BSD, MIT, LGPL rather than the current historical order. Apache is a more modern and comprehensive permissive license than BSD or MIT, even if it's not as widely used yet due to the immense number of older projects. Also, add a note about LGPL 2.1 still being in widespread use. I note that the list claims to be complete, but omits the superseded and retired licenses. I'd put those two categories, plus the non-reusable licenses, into a third list at the bottom labeled "Licenses not recommended for further use." -- John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] Monday we watch-a Firefly's house, but he no come out. He wasn't home. Tuesday we go to the ball game, but he fool us. He no show up. Wednesday he go to the ball game, and we fool him. We no show up. Thursday was a double-header. Nobody show up. Friday it rained all day. There was no ball game, so we stayed home and we listened to it on-a the radio. --Chicolini _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
