Hi.
I tried maling FSFs licensing department, but the FSFs website says something 
to the effect that if they have answered the question on their webpage, the 
mail will be unanswered, and I have not received a reply. So I'm asuming it is 
answered on their website. However I cannot find the answer to this specific 
question, and Google is of no help. So I'm trying this list instead.

I am packaging an old game I recently discovered, which is still in active 
development.
The game (netrek-client-cow) have MIT or an MIT-like license (at least I think 
it's MIT), which have a "and without fee" clause. And I am unsure whether that 
this clause is compatible with Free Software or not. To someone like me, this 
looks like what we today call a no commercial clause.
I have discovered that it most likely is what Fedora call MIT old style. 
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT#Old_Style)

So my question is, is this a Free Software license?

There is two license text files, one is possibly newer that the other. At least 
one of the licence files seems to be from 1986, and the other from 1989.
The license text in full reads:
== 1 ==
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this
software and its documentation for any purpose and without
fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright
notice appear in all copies.
====
== 2 ==
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided
that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both that
copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting
documentation.  No representations are made about the suitability of this
software for any purpose.  It is provided "as is" without express or
implied warranty.
====

-- 
Johnny A. Solbu
web site,   http://www.solbu.net
PGP key ID: 0xFA687324

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss

Reply via email to