On 03/09/2012 09:13 AM, John Cowan wrote:
They would only be different if the organization became politically capable to dis-recommend licenses.And the results would be different this time, why?
I think my favorite is probably still the SIL font license, where it says "The requirement for fonts to remain under this license does not apply to any document created using the Font Software." As far as I can tell, that allows you to convert a font to any license or no license, and then extract it again, and the SIL license doesn't magically come back.
Obviously there's a pretty strong potential to let down developers if that's the case. They end up with no control at all.
Thanks
Bruce
<<attachment: bruce.vcf>>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
