Quoting Jim Jagielski ([email protected]):
> BTW: How is this different from, say, the US export control provisions?
> In both cases, a codebase is encumbered by external, and "localized"
> restrictions. So does this mean that software distributed out of
> the US, no matter the OSI license, isn't "really" open source?
During the period that the RSA algorithm was encumbered by a (somewhat
weak and potentially challengable) patent in USA jurisdictions, mod_ssl
was widely considered to effectively not be open source when deployed in
the USA, yes.
--
Rick Moen There was an old man Said with a laugh, "I
rick@linuxmafia From Peru, whose lim'ricks all Cut them in half, the pay is
.com Looked like haiku. He Much better for two."
McQ! (4x80) --Emmet O'Brien
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss