On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 05:34:45PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: > If the FSF's is the more restrictive interpretation, you then > need to consider cases where the FSF has taken up the mantle of defender > of works for which it arguably did not have a notable direct copyright > interest, as in the Busybox mess
You appear to be mixing up either SFLC or SFC with FSF. - RF _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
