Bob Scheifler writes: > APSL 1.2 seems to discriminate between distribution for research use > and distribution for commercial use (by imposing different obligations).
Yes, it does, however in both cases the licensing satisfies the Open Source Definition. It's like making boys use the boys room and girls use the girls room. It would be unacceptable discrimination to not have any girls room at all. -- --My blog is at angry-economist.russnelson.com | The USA has turned into a Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | people that are afraid of 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | everything and responsible Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | FWD# 404529 via VOIP | for nothing. -- GF -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
