All, esp. Sam: It irks me that some companies or individuals could use open-source software for profit under "internal use", and not pay the original author. Under open source, I then have two choices:
1. Offer the software for free under GPL. Then if no-one redistributes it but uses it internally, I lose the revenue stream from the proprietary license. 2. Offer the software for a price (Ian's model) under BSD. The high price keeps the recipients honest and helps ameliorate the dilution of income due to any redstribution. However, I lose the try-before-you-buy and open-sharing aspects of the open source development model, and would probably be difficult to make competitive, price-wise, in non-niche markets. Cheers, Glen Low, Pixelglow Software www.pixelglow.com -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
