> > What does OSL and ESL stands for? > > Enterprise Source License and OEM Source License. > > I am guessing these are Gluecode-invented names. I have no idea what > licenses are behind those names. For all we know, OEM Source License > may be a BSD license!
If those licenses are not approved by OSI, they may not use our certification mark. We don't care what they "look like." Lawrence Rosen Rosenlaw & Einschlag, technology law offices 3001 King Ranch Road, Ukiah, CA 95482 707-485-1242 * fax: 707-485-1243 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rosenlaw.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 1:42 PM > To: Guilherme C. Hazan > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Why "open-source" means "free to distribute"? > > > On Thu, 6 May 2004, Guilherme C. Hazan wrote: > > > > The paragraphs you seem to be referring to are not licenses. They only > > > refer to OSL and ESL licenses. > > > > What does OSL and ESL stands for? > > Enterprise Source License and OEM Source License. > > I am guessing these are Gluecode-invented names. I have no idea what > licenses are behind those names. For all we know, OEM Source License > may be a BSD license! > > Alex. > > -- > license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3 -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
