At 03:49 PM 2/11/2004, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

> 1) Has an equivalent license been approved already?  I read the
> approved licenses but IANAL and may well have missed one.

Can you indicate how your proposed license differs from the GPL, and
how it differs from the Open Software License?

Yes. Unlike the GPL, the IDPL explicitly allows the software to be distributed, linked, and included in commercial software. Unlike the Open Software License, the IDPL requires that

  if the source is modified, modifications must be published
  under the IDPL license

  and that if part or all of the code is included in another
  product, interfaces between that product and the licensed
  source must be published under the IDPL.


Regards,


Ann
www.ibphoenix.com

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Reply via email to