Hi Pamela, all:

In June 2023, the License Review Working Group completed its work revising the license review process. There was an outstanding task that grew out of the Working Group, which was to create tags for the approved licenses that could be used as an aid in filtering approved licenses for their characteristics.

There are two stages to this task. The first stage is to create a list of tags to be attached to licenses. There is already a preliminary list <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1svyrUgE6xwzaNO4xnhTT0-pHPblwBm__BArtttkQWxk/edit?usp=sharing>, so we should be able to complete this task in a fairly short period of time.

I looked at the list and wondered about its purpose. The tags doesn't say anything about rights, presumably they are all the same for open source licenses. But they also don't say anything about disclaimers and prohibitions?

If this is primarily about obligations, I wanted to point out that German lawyers created a comprehensive system for explaining license obligations, including instructions on how to fulfill them, using some form of pseudo code ("if this do that"). I'm talking about the OSADL folks though I think this stuff is still paywalled.

I'm not sure the OSI is up for it but some authoritative model of license obligations and how to fulfill them would be great. The tags don't have to state how the obligations should be fulfilled, however, their completeness and quality would make it much easier to develop such instructions based on an authoritative ontology (hierarchical list of tags).

Cheers, Dirk

The second stage is to add the tags to the existing licenses. I would like to have as many people as possible willing to assist in this task. There are over 100 licenses and I would like to have each license reviewed by two people, a primary reviewer and verifier. You do not have to be a lawyer to participate, only comfortable reading and understanding open source licenses.

If you are interested in helping with this task, please respond to me only (to save spamming everyone).

Thanks,

Pam Chestek
Chair, License Review Committee
Open Source Initiative

_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-review mailing list
license-rev...@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org

--
Confused about open source?
Get clarity through https://bayave.com/training
--
Website: https://dirkriehle.com - Twitter: @dirkriehle
Ph (DE): +49-157-8153-4150 - Ph (US): +1-650-450-8550


_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not 
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the 
Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

Reply via email to