Well that joke backfired on me, didn't it? I made a charicture of "ethical" licenses, and ended up withdrawing it because I was afraid they'd actually approve it! It was meant to be like a "moot bill". A lot of people did not then, and still do not get the concept. Silly me for expecting them to. I can't truly say I regret pranking them, though.
Regarding anonymity, there is little proof of the identity of many people on this list. Debian always required that someone meet you and cross-sign your key before you could check in a package. You can always take charge of that if you want an effective filter. Thanks Bruce On Mon, Feb 5, 2024, 18:00 McCoy Smith <mc...@lexpan.law> wrote: > I agree. > > Unfortunately, these sort of “whimsical,” unserious, > impossible-to-satisfy-the-OSI-definition submissions are a fairly regular > phenomenon these days on the OSI e-mail lists. I think the submitters who > do this were emboldened by whoever it was that submitted the Vaccine > License <https://blog.opensource.org/licensereview102019/> back in 2019. > Shame on that person for starting the trend. > > I think OSI was going to use the Vaccine License submission and subsequent > history as an example of what people should not be doing (and probably > should also have a policy that potentially frowns upon anonymized > submissions) and put something about that in the pages on license > discussion/review. Might want to revisit that. > > > > *From:* Bruce Perens <br...@perens.com> > *Sent:* Monday, February 5, 2024 8:03 AM > *To:* mc...@lexpan.law > *Cc:* license-discuss@lists.opensource.org > *Subject:* Re: [License-discuss] License Review Request - Anu Initiative > > > > It is a crayon license, and the author points out its whimsical nature > while wishfully saying the terms bind anyway. There is no point in passing > it on for disapproval or doing anything else to take it seriously. Just > politely tell the author there isn't a chance. > > > > IMO if you want to help the open source community, don't draft a new > license. I actually do not see value in even continuing the approval > process at this late date. It's just not the case that any new submission > contributes useful art. > > > > Thanks > > > > Bruce > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024, 15:52 McCoy Smith <mc...@lexpan.law> wrote: > > And asked for review. Which he got. > > Do you disagree that this license can’t get OSI approval? > > > > *From:* Bruce Perens <br...@perens.com> > *Sent:* Monday, February 5, 2024 7:47 AM > *To:* mc...@lexpan.law; license-discuss@lists.opensource.org > *Subject:* Re: [License-discuss] License Review Request - Anu Initiative > > > > Note that he sent his review request to license-discuss. > > > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024, 15:45 McCoy Smith <mc...@lexpan.law> wrote: > > Daniel: > > In order to have a license reviewed, you need to provide the assurances > and information about the license ( > https://opensource.org/licenses/review-process/) including that it > doesn’t violate any of the OSD. You have not done any of that. > > Since Section 4 of this license does violate OSD 6, it’s not approvable. > So I’d suggest that this license be forwarded to the Board for denial. > > > > > > *From:* License-discuss <license-discuss-boun...@lists.opensource.org> *On > Behalf Of *Daniel Mihai > *Sent:* Saturday, February 3, 2024 10:10 AM > *To:* license-discuss@lists.opensource.org > *Subject:* [License-discuss] License Review Request - Anu Initiative > > > > Hi friends, > > > > I hope this message finds you well and embracing the natural world with > enthusiasm and care. > > > > I'm reaching out from the Anu Initiative, a nonprofit organization rooted > in Dublin, Ireland, with a mission deeply intertwined with the love and > restoration of our planet. We are a collective of nature enthusiasts > leveraging innovative technologies to mend the environmental scars left by > human activities and certain technological impacts. > > > > At Anu Initiative, we are not just another entity in the environmental > sphere. We diverge from the conventional path of carbon credits, focusing > instead on tangible ecological contributions. Our open-source platform > epitomizes transparency, allowing anyone to witness the journey of every > contribution made towards a greener tomorrow. > > > > As we continue to weave technology with nature's restoration, we are > reviewing our Open License Agreement to ensure it aligns with our core > values of Transparency, Passion, Integrity, Commitment, and Community. Your > expertise and insights would be invaluable in this process. > > > > Could you please review our agreement? > https://forum.anuinitiative.org/t/anu-initiative-open-license-agreement-ai-ola/80 > > > > Thank you for considering our request. Together, we can turn the tide > towards a sustainable future. > > > > Warm regards, > > > > *Daniel Mihai* > > Founder and CTO > > > > *Mobile:* +353 (0) 87 450 8112 > *E-mail:* dan...@anuinitiative.org > > *Web-site:* https://anuinitiative.org > > > *Let’s take the initiative!* > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not > necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the > Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. > > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@lists.opensource.org > > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org > >
_______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
