On 1/3/24 23:56, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I'm wondering the best way to go about distributing some files in
> an ICU Licensed project, but without requiring any attribution.

May I suggest Zero Clause BSD:

https://spdx.org/licenses/0BSD.html
https://opensource.org/license/0bsd/

Created in 2013:

https://landley.net/hg/toybox/rev/264b9da809df
https://landley.net/toybox/license.html

Merged into Android in 2014 (shipped in Android 6.0 "Marshmallow"):

https://lwn.net/Articles/629362/

SPDX short identifier "0BSD" was granted in 2015:

https://lists.spdx.org/g/spdx/message/967

In the github choose-a-license pulldown since 2019:

https://github.com/landley/toybox/blob/master/LICENSE

Currently over 50k repositories there licensed under it:

https://github.com/search?q=license:0bsd&type=Repositories

Zero Clause BSD is the "OpenBSD suggested template license" with half a sentence
removed. The openbsd license is actually an ISC derivative (not from berkeley)
but OpenBSD is one of the 3 main BSD distros, and I got permission from Kirk
McKusick to call it a BSD license in 2013. (He was a Guest of Honor at Ohio
Linuxfest's celebration of the 45th anniversary of Unix. I also got to sit next
to Doug McIlroy at dinner there.)

https://landley.net/toybox/0bsd-mckusick.txt

The discussion that led to Github adding 0BSD to choose-a-license had large
infodumps about how and why the license came to be, if you're curious:

https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com/issues/464#issuecomment-289236817
https://github.com/github/choosealicense.com/issues/464#issuecomment-289526758

The technical category is "public domain equivalent license":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-domain-equivalent_license

The logic for the name was "Your Fortune 500 legal department has already
approved 4 clause BSD, 3 clause BSD, and 2 clause BSD... here's another one for
rubber stamping." And given that even Microsoft's using it...

https://github.com/microsoft/tslib/blob/main/LICENSE.txt

Rob

_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not 
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the 
Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

Reply via email to