On 7/27/20 4:12 AM, Paulo Coghi - Coghi IT wrote:
> I recently discovered the fair-code model (https://faircode.io/) and I
> would like to know if it "fits" on any specific OSI approved license.
> 
> It was created by n8n's author (https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n) as a way
> to solve the long discussion taken here
> https://github.com/n8n-io/n8n/issues/40 after he called his software
> "open source"

This is just a rebranding of the Commons Clause.  It is not
OSI-compliant, and cannot be made OSI-compliant.

A more accurate labeling of this licensing technique would be
"Shareware".  Shareware has a long history in this industry, and is one
way of monetizing software, and despite contempt for the label, is still
a viable model today.  It is, however, not open source.

I could go into the various reasons, both practical and moral, why open
source is superior to the shareware model, but that seems like
well-trodden ground.

-- 
Josh Berkus

_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not 
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the 
Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

Reply via email to