On 5/15/2020 11:13 AM, Tobie Langel wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:55 PM Richard Fontana <rfont...@redhat.com > <mailto:rfont...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:28 AM Tobie Langel > <to...@unlockopen.com <mailto:to...@unlockopen.com>> wrote: > > The license review process[1] states that you need to have > "appropriate standing" to submit a license review request. > > > > What does that term mean and where is it defined? > > > > Could we either define it on the same page or remove this > requirement altogether? > > It's not obvious but I think it refers to the "by" line in the > description of the submission types. > > In the normal "For Approval" case, it's the license steward who has > appropriate standing. > > In the "Retirement" case, it's "license steward (only)", which hints > that there might be cases where a non-steward could do an approval > submission for the "approval" case (as has happened a few times). > > In the "Legacy Approval" case, it's the license steward or "interested > licensee". > > > Thank you, Richard. > > I don't think there's an easy way to suggest wording changes to the > website without pestering Patrick, is there? If you write it I can make the changes to the page.
Pam Pamela Chestek Chair, License Review Committee Open Source Initiative
_______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
