On 3/31/20 1:13 PM, McCoy Smith wrote: > FWIW, if you take out the badgeware part of AAL, you're left with nothing > much that's different from, say, BSD (upon which AAL is based). There is > paragraph 4, but I'm not sure that's adds anything to straight 3-clause BSD. > So I'm not sure what would be the benefit of trying to come up with an > improved AAL 2.0. Better to just deprecate it and recommend BSD 3-clause > as a preferred alternative.
At the request of Hillel Coren, I was going to offer up a "corrected" version that replaced the badgeware clause with attribution language more similar to the GPLv3. Which would kinda make it the "acceptable BSD 4-clause". -- Josh Berkus _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
