On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 1:33 PM Hillel Coren <hillelco...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I saw this comment "[the license] does not appear to be used for any
> currently available/working software", that simply isn't true. I'm one of
> the co-founders of Invoice Ninja, we use this license and think it's a
> great fit for us.
>
> https://github.com/invoiceninja/invoiceninja
>
> I'm more than happy to have an open discussion about it.
>


For clarity, what does "remove the AAL license" mean to you?

If it was no longer on the list of OSI approved licenses, that doesn't mean
you can't still use that license.  It only means that the OSI no longer
considers the license sufficient for calling a software project using that
license to be Open Source.

I'm worried that some people believe the OSI owns these licenses, and that
if the OSI no longer considers a license to be approved that people are
somehow restricted from continuing to use that license.
_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not 
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the 
Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

Reply via email to