On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:29 PM Henrik Ingo <henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi> wrote:
> Sure. In my list the start of the 15 months review is essentially a > deprecation. I didn't want to use that word, because deprecation to me > implies the decision is already final. But I'm not against it either. > I would favour having a preliminary step of "deprecation" based on a Board-validated consensus that the license is no longer acceptable, followed by a delayed removal step after either a process like you describe or several years of deprecated status with no challenge. This will ensure that the concern some have expressed about gaming a removal process can be addressed without blocking the ability to advise people not to use certain licenses any more when it seems obvious. Simon (personally)
_______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
