Quoting Pamela Chestek (pam...@chesteklegal.com): > Have you been reading the rationale documents I've been writing (for > both approved and unapproved licenses) since I became chair? Is that not > what you mean? > > CALv1: > https://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Archived+Discussions+on+Not+Approved+Licenses/Rationale+Vaccine+License/
Probable intended URL for above: https://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Working+Groups+%26+Incubator+Projects/Archived+Discussions+on+Not+Approved+Licenses/Rationale+Cryptographic+Autonomy+License/ > Vaccine License: > https://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Archived+Discussions+on+Not+Approved+Licenses/Rationale+Vaccine+License/ > > They're linked from the rejected licenses page. Since this ought to be said more often and more loudly: Thank you, Pam. These are small miracles of clarity and enlightenment. Index page ('rejected licenses page') is here: https://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Archived+Discussions+on+Not+Approved+Licenses/ -- Cheers, « Le doute n'est pas une état bien agréable, mais Rick Moen l'assurance est un état ridicule. » ("Doubt is not r...@linuxmafia.com a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.') McQ! (4x80) -- Voltaire _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
